Racket profile

Head Speed MP 2026

Head’s all-rounder: 300 g, for players who split their time between the baseline and the net.

Editorial verdict

Is it worth demoing?

Best for

Consider it if you play singles and doubles and want one racket that does a bit of everything.

Think twice if

Check you can still swing it freely at the end of a long session. If your preparation starts to slow, a lighter model may suit you better.

What the specifications establish

Facts and their source states. They do not predict exactly how this racket will feel to you.

Frame weight
300 g
manufacturer · checked 2026-10-07Manufacturer-listed 300 g frame weightSource ↗
Head size
100 sq in
manufacturer · checked 2026-10-07Source ↗
String pattern
16 × 19
manufacturer · checked 2026-10-07Source ↗
Balance
320 mm / 1 in HL
manufacturer · checked 2026-10-07Source ↗
Beam
23 mm
manufacturer · checked 2026-10-07Source ↗
Length
Not published / not verified
unverified · checked 2026-10-07Source ↗
Stiffness
Not published / not verified
unverified · checked 2026-10-07Source ↗
Swingweight
Not published / not verified
unverified · checked 2026-10-07Source ↗
Manufacturer tension range
Not published / not verified
unverified · checked 2026-10-07Source ↗

HEAD UK specifications checked on 7 October 2026: 300 g, 320 mm balance, 100 sq in, 16×19 and 23 mm beam. HEAD does not publish length, RA or swingweight in the checked product specification block.

UK buying options

Frame quotes are dated observations. Add strings, labour and delivery where required.

RetailerFrameStringsDeliveryTotalStockChecked
Tennis-Point£162.90unstrungNot recordedNeeds full quoteyes2026-10-06
Tennisnuts£171.99strungNot recordedNeeds full quoteunknown2026-10-08
Pro:Direct£172.00unstrungNot recordedNeeds full quoteyes2026-10-06

Ready-to-play calculator

Alternatives worth demoing

Editorial shortlist based on published frame class and weight; compare on court.

Head

Radical MP 2025

A 300 g all-court racket with a 98 sq in head, for club players who swing with confidence.

£169.99All Things Tennis · strung · checked 2026-10-06

Trade-off: The smaller head asks for more accurate contact than a 100 sq in frame. Check your timing in the last half-hour, not just the first.

Wilson

Blade 100 v10

The Blade with a bigger 100 sq in head, for players who find the 98 a little too exacting.

£189.90Tennis-Point · unstrung · checked 2026-10-06

Trade-off: A bigger head doesn’t automatically mean more pace. If depth is your main problem, try the EZONE 100 as well.

Wilson

Blade 100 v9 (previous)

The previous-generation Blade 100, with the same 100 sq in head.

£147.90Tennis-Point · unstrung · checked 2026-10-06

Trade-off: Check the depth you get on your normal swing. And make sure the listing really is the v9 before you compare prices.

Strings and ownership

Use the manufacturer range above where it is published. Agree the material, thickness and starting tension with your stringer; there is no universal setup for this frame.

Start with your string problem →

Buying used

Check bumper, hoop, throat, grommets and grip. Structural doubt overrides a cosmetic grade. Include replacement parts and a restring in the total.

Check a used listing →
From published reviews

What reviewers say

These are other reviewers’ findings, not our own play tests. Their strings, tension and playing style may differ from yours.

Most testers found it a clear step forward: more stable and better-feeling, if a little heavier to swing.

They liked

  • Better stability than the last version
  • A crisp, solid feel that isn't overly muted
  • Easy spin with good control

Watch out for

  • The swingweight felt high to some testers
  • A few missed touch on volleys and drop shots
  • Players still need to generate their own pace

Where they differ: Tennis Express found it soft and arm-friendly; Sportega felt it was less damped than expected and took longer to settle into.

Summarised from reviews by Tennis Warehouse, Tennis Express and Sportega, read October 2026.

Sources and methodology

Exact model reference ↗ · source checked 2026-10-07

How we separate facts and judgement →